DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2016.03.033
THE MATRIX CONVERTER INPUT CURRENT FORMATION IN THE CASE OF INPUT VOLTAGE DISTORTIONS
Journal |
Tekhnichna elektrodynamika |
Publisher |
Institute of Electrodynamics National Academy of Science of Ukraine |
ISSN |
1607-7970 (print), 2218-1903 (online) |
Issue |
№ 3, 2016 (May/June) |
Pages |
33 – 35 |
Authors V.М.Mykhalskyi1*, V.M.Sobolev1, V.V.Chopyk1, I.А.Shapoval1**, M.Yu. Artemenko2 1 – Institute of Electrodynamics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Peremohy pr., 56, Kyiv-57, 03680, Ukraine, e-mail:
Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript
2 – National Technical University of Ukraine "KPI", Peremohy pr., 37, Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine, e-mail:
Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript
ORCID ID: * http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-3111 ORCID ID: ** http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-5061
Abstract
The matrix converter (MC) control methods based on MC input reactive power control algorithm, which aims to improve the quality of the MC input currents under conditions of non-sinusoidal voltages of the power network have been developed and studied. With this purpose, variants of setting the direction of the input current space vector relative to the input voltage space vector by appropriate regulation of the reactive component of the current have been considered. The simulation showed the effectiveness of the proposed approach to improve the quality of the MC input currents. References 7, figures 2, table 1.
Key words: matrix converter, input current, reactive power, non-sinusoidal input voltage.
Received: 25.01.2016 Accepted: 23.03.2016 Published: 25.04.2016
References
1. Mykhalskyi V.M., Sobolev V.M., Shapoval I.A., Chopyk V.V. Maximizing the control range of a matrix converter. Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika. 2015. No 1. P. 7–13. (Ukr) 2. Blaabjerg F., Casadei D., Klumpner C., Matteini M. Comparison of two current modulation strategies for matrix converters under unbalanced input voltage conditions. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics. April 2002. Vol. 49. No 2. P. 289–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/41.993261 3. Casadei D., Serra G., Tani A. A general approach for the analysis of the input power quality in matrix converters. Proc. IEEE-PESC ‘96, Baveno, Italy. June 23-27, 1996. Vol. II. P. 1128–1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PESC.1996.548723 4. Casadei D., Serra G., Tani A. Reduction of the input current harmonic content in matrix converters under input/output unbalance. Proc. of IEEE-IECON ‘95, Orlando, Florida. 6-10 Nov. 1995. Vol. I. P. 457–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1995.483452 5. Casadei D., Serra G., Tani A. Reduction of the input current harmonic content in matrix converters under input/output unbalance. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics. June 1998. Vol. 45. No 3. P. 401–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/41.678998 6. Mykhalskyi V.M., Sobolev V.M., Chopyk V.V., Polishchuk S.Y., Shapoval I.A. Matrix converter control strategy maximizing reactive power transfer. Proceeding of the International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems (IEPS). Kyiv (Ukraine). June 02-06, 2014. P. 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEPS.2014.6874193 7. Nielsen P., Casadei D., Serra G., Tani A. Evaluation of the input current quality by three different modulation strategies for SVM controlled matrix converters with input voltage unbalance. Proc. of IEEE-PEDES ’96, New Delhi, India, Jan. 8-11, 1996. Vol. II. P. 794–800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDES.1996.536375
PDF
|